References
[1]
T. Chakraborty, Quantum dots: a survey of the properties of artificial atoms (Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1999).
Google Scholar
https://scholar.google.com/scholar?&q=T. Chakraborty, Quantum dots: a survey of the properties of artificial atoms (Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1999)&
[2]
Pfannkuche
D.,
Gudmundsson
V.,
Maksym
P.A..
Phys. Rev. B,
1993, 47: 2244
Google Scholar
https://scholar.google.com/scholar?author=Pfannkuche D.&author=Gudmundsson V.&author=Maksym P.A.&publication_year=1993&journal=Phys. Rev. B&volume=47&pages=2244
[3]
Ferconi
M.,
Vignale
G..
Phys. Rev. B,
1994, 50: 14722
Google Scholar
https://scholar.google.com/scholar?author=Ferconi M.&author=Vignale G.&publication_year=1994&journal=Phys. Rev. B&volume=50&pages=14722
[4]
Hirose
K.,
Wingreen
N.S..
Phys. Rev. B,
1999, 59: 4604
Google Scholar
https://scholar.google.com/scholar?author=Hirose K.&author=Wingreen N.S.&publication_year=1999&journal=Phys. Rev. B&volume=59&pages=4604
[5]
Lee
I.H.,
Rao
V.,
Martin
R.M.,
Leburton
J.P..
Phys. Rev. B,
1998, 57: 9035
Google Scholar
https://scholar.google.com/scholar?author=Lee I.H.&author=Rao V.&author=Martin R.M.&author=Leburton J.P.&publication_year=1998&journal=Phys. Rev. B&volume=57&pages=9035
[6]
D.G. Austing, S. Sasaki, S. Tarucha, S.M. Reimann, M. Koskinen, M. Manninen, Phys. Rev. B 60, 11 514 (1999).
Google Scholar
https://scholar.google.com/scholar?&q=D.G. Austing, S. Sasaki, S. Tarucha, S.M. Reimann, M. Koskinen, M. Manninen, Phys. Rev. B 60, 11 514 (1999)&
[7]
Yannouleas
C.,
Landman
U..
Phys. Rev. Lett.,
1999, 82: 5325
Google Scholar
https://scholar.google.com/scholar?author=Yannouleas C.&author=Landman U.&publication_year=1999&journal=Phys. Rev. Lett.&volume=82&pages=5325
[8]
Yannouleas
C.,
Landman
U..
Phys. Rev. B,
2000, 61: 15895
Google Scholar
https://scholar.google.com/scholar?author=Yannouleas C.&author=Landman U.&publication_year=2000&journal=Phys. Rev. B&volume=61&pages=15895
[9]
Yannouleas
C.,
Landman
U..
Phys. Rev. Lett.,
2000, 85: 1726
Google Scholar
https://scholar.google.com/scholar?author=Yannouleas C.&author=Landman U.&publication_year=2000&journal=Phys. Rev. Lett.&volume=85&pages=1726
[10]
Barnett
R.N.,
Cleveland
C.L.,
Häkkinen
H.,
Luedtke
W.D.,
Yannouleas
C.,
Landman
U..
Eur. Phys. J. D,
1999, 9: 95
Google Scholar
https://scholar.google.com/scholar?author=Barnett R.N.&author=Cleveland C.L.&author=Häkkinen H.&author=Luedtke W.D.&author=Yannouleas C.&author=Landman U.&publication_year=1999&journal=Eur. Phys. J. D&volume=9&pages=95
[11]
Kellman
M.E.,
Herrick
D.R.,
Phys
J.,
Kellman
M.E..
L755 (1978); (b) Phys. Rev. A,
1980, 22: 1536
Google Scholar
https://scholar.google.com/scholar?author=Kellman M.E.&author=Herrick D.R.&author=Phys J.&author=Kellman M.E.&publication_year=1980&journal=L755 (1978); (b) Phys. Rev. A&volume=22&pages=1536
[12]
Ezra
G.S.,
Berry
R.S.,
Berry
R.S., et al.
Phys. Rev. Lett.,
1981, 47: 497
Google Scholar
https://scholar.google.com/scholar?author=Ezra G.S.&author=Berry R.S.&author=Berry R.S.&publication_year=1981&journal=Phys. Rev. Lett.&volume=47&pages=497
[13]
Nagaraja
S.,
Leburton
J.P.,
Martin
R.M..
Phys. Rev. B,
1999, 60: 8759
Google Scholar
https://scholar.google.com/scholar?author=Nagaraja S.&author=Leburton J.P.&author=Martin R.M.&publication_year=1999&journal=Phys. Rev. B&volume=60&pages=8759
[14]
Wensauer
A.,
Steffens
O.,
Suhrke
M.,
Rössler
U..
Phys. Rev. B,
2000, 62: 2605
Google Scholar
https://scholar.google.com/scholar?author=Wensauer A.&author=Steffens O.&author=Suhrke M.&author=Rössler U.&publication_year=2000&journal=Phys. Rev. B&volume=62&pages=2605
[15]
Burkard
G.,
Loss
D.,
DiVincenzo
D.P..
Phys. Rev. B,
1999, 59: 2070
Google Scholar
https://scholar.google.com/scholar?author=Burkard G.&author=Loss D.&author=DiVincenzo D.P.&publication_year=1999&journal=Phys. Rev. B&volume=59&pages=2070
[16]
Hu
X.,
Das Sarma
S..
Phys. Rev. A,
2000, 61: 062301
Google Scholar
https://scholar.google.com/scholar?author=Hu X.&author=Das Sarma S.&publication_year=2000&journal=Phys. Rev. A&volume=61&pages=062301
[17]
Within the terminology adopted here, the simple designation Hartree-Fock (HF) in the literature most often refers to our restricted HF (RHF), in particular in atomic physics and the physics of the homogeneous electron gas. In nuclear physics, however, the simple designation HF most often refers to a space (S)-UHF. The simple designation unrestricted Hartree-Fock (UHF) in Chemistry most often refers to our s-UHF.
Google Scholar
https://scholar.google.com/scholar?&q=Within the terminology adopted here, the simple designation Hartree-Fock (HF) in the literature most often refers to our restricted HF (RHF), in particular in atomic physics and the physics of the homogeneous electron gas. In nuclear physics, however, the simple designation HF most often refers to a space (S)-UHF. The simple designation unrestricted Hartree-Fock (UHF) in Chemistry most often refers to our s-UHF&
[18]
Yannouleas
C.,
Wong
C.Y., et al.
J. Phys. Chem.,
1995, 99: 14577
Google Scholar
https://scholar.google.com/scholar?author=Yannouleas C.&author=Wong C.Y.&publication_year=1995&journal=J. Phys. Chem.&volume=99&pages=14577
[19]
Pople
J.A..
Google Scholar
https://scholar.google.com/scholar?author=Pople J.A.&
[20]
The parameter controlling the appearance of electron localization within each individual dot is $R_W \equiv Q/\hbar \omega_0$ , where Q is the Coulomb interaction strength and $\hbar \omega_0$ is the characteristic energy of the parabolic confinement; $Q=e^2/\kappa l_0$ , with $l_0=(\hbar/m^* \omega_0)^{1/2}$ being the spatial extent of the lowest state's wave function in the parabolic confinement. With the sS-UHF, we find that Wigner crystallization occurs in both the single QD's and QDM's for R W > 1. For $\kappa=20$ , one has R W =0.95.
Google Scholar
https://scholar.google.com/scholar?&q=The parameter controlling the appearance of electron localization within each individual dot is $R_W \equiv Q/\hbar \omega_0$ , where Q is the Coulomb interaction strength and $\hbar \omega_0$ is the characteristic energy of the parabolic confinement; $Q=e^2/\kappa l_0$ , with $l_0=(\hbar/m^* \omega_0)^{1/2}$ being the spatial extent of the lowest state's wave function in the parabolic confinement. With the sS-UHF, we find that Wigner crystallization occurs in both the single QD's and QDM's for R W > 1. For $\kappa=20$ , one has R W =0.95&
[21]
See section 3.8 in Ref. [19](a).
Google Scholar
https://scholar.google.com/scholar?&q=See section 3.8 in Ref. [19](a)&
[22]
Koskinen
M.,
Manninen
M.,
Reimann
S.M..
Phys. Rev. Lett.,
1997, 79: 1389
Google Scholar
https://scholar.google.com/scholar?author=Koskinen M.&author=Manninen M.&author=Reimann S.M.&publication_year=1997&journal=Phys. Rev. Lett.&volume=79&pages=1389
[23]
Löwdin
P.O..
Phys. Rev. B,
1955, 97: 1509
Google Scholar
https://scholar.google.com/scholar?author=Löwdin P.O.&publication_year=1955&journal=Phys. Rev. B&volume=97&pages=1509
[24]
R. Pauncz, Alternant Molecular Orbital Method (W.B. Saunders Co., Philadelphia, 1967).
Google Scholar
https://scholar.google.com/scholar?&q=R. Pauncz, Alternant Molecular Orbital Method (W.B. Saunders Co., Philadelphia, 1967)&
[25]
Heitler
H.,
London
F..
Z. Phys.,
1927, 44: 455
Google Scholar
https://scholar.google.com/scholar?author=Heitler H.&author=London F.&publication_year=1927&journal=Z. Phys.&volume=44&pages=455
[26]
C.A. Coulson, Valence (Oxford University Press, London, 1961).
Google Scholar
https://scholar.google.com/scholar?&q=C.A. Coulson, Valence (Oxford University Press, London, 1961)&
[27]
J.N. Murrell, S.F. Kettle, J.M. Tedder, The Chemical Bond (Wiley, New York, 1985).
Google Scholar
https://scholar.google.com/scholar?&q=J.N. Murrell, S.F. Kettle, J.M. Tedder, The Chemical Bond (Wiley, New York, 1985)&
[28]
The early electronic model of valence was primarily developed by G.N. Lewis who introduced a symbolism where an electron was represented by a dot, e.g., H:H, with a dot between the atomic symbols denoting a shared electron. Later in 1927 Heitler and London formulated the first quantum mechanical theory of the pair-electron bond for the case of the hydrogen molecule. The theory was subsequently developed by Pauling and others in the 1930's into the modern theory of the chemical bond called the Valence Bond Theory.
Google Scholar
https://scholar.google.com/scholar?&q=The early electronic model of valence was primarily developed by G.N. Lewis who introduced a symbolism where an electron was represented by a dot, e.g., H:H, with a dot between the atomic symbols denoting a shared electron. Later in 1927 Heitler and London formulated the first quantum mechanical theory of the pair-electron bond for the case of the hydrogen molecule. The theory was subsequently developed by Pauling and others in the 1930's into the modern theory of the chemical bond called the Valence Bond Theory&
[29]
Refs. [15,16] have studied, as a function of the magnetic field, the behavior of the singlet-triplet splitting of the QD H2 by diagonalizing the two-electron Hamiltonian inside the minimal four-dimensional basis formed by the products $\phi_L({\bf r}_1)\phi_L({\bf r}_2)$ , $\phi_L({\bf r}_1)\phi_R({\bf r}_2)$ , $\phi_R({\bf r}_1)\phi_L({\bf r}_2)$ , $\phi_R({\bf r}_1)\phi_R({\bf r}_2)$ of the 1s orbitals of the separated QD's. This Hubbard-type method [15] (as well as the refinement employed by Ref. [16] of enlarging the minimal two-electron basis to include the p orbitals of the separated QD's) is an improvement over the simple HL method (see Ref. [15]), but apparently it is only appropriate for the weak-coupling regime at sufficiently large distances and/or interdot barriers. Our method is free of such limitations, since we employ an interdot-distance adjustable basis (see section 2) of at least 66 spatial TCO molecular orbitals when solving for the sS-UHF ones. Even with consideration of the symmetries, this amounts to calculating a large number of two-body Coulomb matrix elements, of the order of 106.
Google Scholar
https://scholar.google.com/scholar?&q=Refs. [15,16] have studied, as a function of the magnetic field, the behavior of the singlet-triplet splitting of the QD H2 by diagonalizing the two-electron Hamiltonian inside the minimal four-dimensional basis formed by the products $\phi_L({\bf r}_1)\phi_L({\bf r}_2)$ , $\phi_L({\bf r}_1)\phi_R({\bf r}_2)$ , $\phi_R({\bf r}_1)\phi_L({\bf r}_2)$ , $\phi_R({\bf r}_1)\phi_R({\bf r}_2)$ of the 1s orbitals of the separated QD's. This Hubbard-type method [15] (as well as the refinement employed by Ref. [16] of enlarging the minimal two-electron basis to include the p orbitals of the separated QD's) is an improvement over the simple HL method (see Ref. [15]), but apparently it is only appropriate for the weak-coupling regime at sufficiently large distances and/or interdot barriers. Our method is free of such limitations, since we employ an interdot-distance adjustable basis (see section 2) of at least 66 spatial TCO molecular orbitals when solving for the sS-UHF ones. Even with consideration of the symmetries, this amounts to calculating a large number of two-body Coulomb matrix elements, of the order of 106&
[30]
Goddard III
W.A., et al.
Acc. Chem. Res.,
1973, 6: 368
Google Scholar
https://scholar.google.com/scholar?author=Goddard III W.A.&publication_year=1973&journal=Acc. Chem. Res.&volume=6&pages=368
[31]
See section 3.8.7 in Ref. [19](a).
Google Scholar
https://scholar.google.com/scholar?&q=See section 3.8.7 in Ref. [19](a)&
[32]
Symmetry
,
e Plutonium
, et al.
Phys. Rev. A,
1995, 51: 4531
Google Scholar
https://scholar.google.com/scholar?author=Symmetry &author=e Plutonium &publication_year=1995&journal=Phys. Rev. A&volume=51&pages=4531